Duelbet
Each area is rated out of 10 from the data we could verify, then weighted as shown — a ×3 area counts three times as much as a ×1. Player reviews make up the remaining 15% of the Conly Score.
Licence strength, casino age and the T&C trust analysis.
Wagering, whether the bonus is sticky, the max bet, the cashout cap and the time limit.
Provider line-up and payment method breadth.
Responsible-gambling tools such as deposit limits and self-exclusion.
This score is calculated from the data we currently hold on this casino — licences, T&C, payments, bonuses and player tools. It is an independent estimate, not a guarantee, and can change as we verify new information.
How we scoreT&C AI Overview
DuelBet is an online casino operated by 1Adventure Ltd under an Anjouan licence. The platform features games, cases, and upgrades, with terms specifying a 1x deposit turnover and robust responsible gaming options, though specific withdrawal limits and bonus rules are left to the cashier and promotional terms.
Payment methods
Game providers
Games offered
Live Casino
Available
Roulette
Available
Baccarat
Available
Game Shows
Available
Screenshots
Casino Details
Player reviews
No reviews yet
Played at Duelbet? Share your experience to help other players choose with confidence.
Duelbet Score Description
Duelbet launched in 2024 under the operation of 1Adventure Ltd. The platform holds a single verified licence from Anjouan. Crucially, the United Kingdom is restricted. Players from Great Britain cannot register or open an account here.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Licence | Anjouan |
| Deposit turnover | 1x |
| Bonus type | Non-sticky |
| Conly Score | 6.10 |
Trust & safety
Anjouan operates as a registration-style jurisdiction. It offers no binding external dispute resolution for players. Anyone in a dispute with Duelbet must rely on the operator's internal complaints procedure. Recourse is highly limited. Established in 2024, the brand has almost no operational history to evaluate. The terms analysis yields a trust score of 60 out of 100. One notable clause allows the operator to amend terms at any time without notice. Rules can change overnight, leaving the burden of monitoring entirely on the player.
Bonuses
The structured record shows that bonuses are non-sticky. Real money and bonus funds remain separate. However, the general terms do not detail wagering requirements, maximum bets, or expiration periods. These rules are left entirely to individual promotional terms. Baseline fairness remains unmeasured. On the deposit side, a standard 1x turnover requirement is enforced. Players must wager all deposited funds once before requesting a withdrawal.
Games & payments
The game catalogue features 44 providers. Major studios like Pragmatic Play, Playtech, Evolution Gaming, and Red Tiger are present. This ensures a broad selection of slots and live tables. The cashier lists 11 payment methods, including Visa, MasterCard, Skrill, and Jeton. Several cryptocurrencies are also supported. However, the recorded account currencies are exclusively digital assets like Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Tether. Players can deposit using traditional fiat methods, but they must manage their accounts in cryptocurrency.
Support & comfort
Six responsible gaming tools are available. These include deposit limits, wager limits, loss limits, session limits, time-outs, and self-exclusion. This represents a solid framework for player protection. Conversely, the identity verification process is highly demanding. The required documents list contains eight separate items. The operator requests standard identification alongside highly invasive items like tax documentation and liveness verification. No specific processing deadlines for these documents are stated in the terms.
Conly Score
The final score stands at 6.10 out of 10. Missing data heavily affects the rating. Nearly half of what the score looks for is not on file. The complete lack of specified withdrawal limits, fees, and processing times prevents a full financial assessment. Trustpilot shows a rating of 3.8, but this is based on only two reviews. Two reviews are far too few to indicate genuine player sentiment. The record shows a platform with a strong game selection and robust player-protection tools, but one obscured by significant gaps in its public terms.