William Hill
Each area is rated out of 10 from the data we could verify, then weighted as shown — a ×3 area counts three times as much as a ×1. Player reviews make up the remaining 15% of the Conly Score.
Licence strength, casino age and the T&C trust analysis.
Wagering, whether the bonus is sticky, the max bet, the cashout cap and the time limit.
Provider line-up and payment method breadth.
Responsible-gambling tools such as deposit limits and self-exclusion.
This score is calculated from the data we currently hold on this casino — licences, T&C, payments, bonuses and player tools. It is an independent estimate, not a guarantee, and can change as we verify new information.
How we scoreT&C AI Overview
William Hill is a highly established and heavily regulated online betting and gaming brand operated by WHG (International) Limited, William Hill Global PLC, and WH Ireland Limited. It offers comprehensive sports betting and casino services under licenses from the UK, Gibraltar, Malta, and Ireland, with a strong focus on safer gambling tools.
Payment methods
Game providers
Games offered
Slots
Available
Live Casino
Available
Roulette
Available
Jackpots
Available
Sports Betting
Available
Blackjack
Available
Poker
Available
Bingo
Available
Casino Details
Player reviews
No reviews yet
Played at William Hill? Share your experience to help other players choose with confidence.
William Hill Score Description
William Hill was established in 1998 and is operated by WHG (International) Limited. Malta operations run under William Hill Malta PLC. The brand holds verified licences from the UK Gambling Commission, the Malta Gaming Authority, and the Gibraltar Regulatory Authority. Players from Great Britain are permitted to register.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Licence | UKGC, MGA, Gibraltar |
| Bonus structure | Non-sticky |
| Conly Score | 6.00 |
Trust & safety
The regulatory framework relies on supervision from the UK Gambling Commission and the Malta Gaming Authority. Both regulators mandate access to independent dispute resolution bodies, specifically IBAS and eCOGRA. The brand has traded since 1998. This history spans nearly three decades. The terms trust score is 86 out of 100. Two restrictive conditions stand out. An inactive account fee of £3 per month applies after 13 months of dormancy. The operator also reserves the right to withhold balances under vague triggers, such as betting exploitatively or playing without genuine play.
Bonuses
The structured record for promotional terms is highly limited. Bonuses are recorded as non-sticky. This separates deposit funds from bonus funds, allowing cashouts of cash winnings before wagering begins. The exact wagering multiplier, maximum bet limits, and expiration periods are absent from the data. No assessment of promotional fairness is possible without these missing figures.
Games & payments
The game catalogue features titles from ten recorded studios, including NetEnt, Playtech, Games Global, and Pragmatic Play. These providers cover slots, live casino tables, and jackpots. The cashier lists only three payment methods: PayPal, Apple Pay, and Bank Transfer. Transactions run in British Pounds and Euros. This narrow selection limits flexibility despite the security of the individual rails.
Support & comfort
Five responsible gaming tools are active. These cover deposit limits, wager limits, time-outs, gaming time reminders, and self-exclusion. The verification process is detailed. Players must submit standard documents like a passport, ID card, and proof of address. The terms also reserve the right to request bank statements, a photograph of the player holding their ID, or certified copies of identification. No specific deadline for document approval is recorded.
Conly Score
The final score stands at 6.00 out of 10. The outcome reflects a highly uneven data record. Strong regulatory credentials and robust player-protection tools support the brand. However, the complete absence of structured payout speeds and withdrawal fees holds back the evaluation. Trustpilot records a low player rating of 1.2 out of 5. The rating comes from 7,427 reviews. Such a high volume of feedback stands in sharp contrast to the regulatory standing. About forty percent of what the score looks for is simply not on file.